Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds an execution-focused requirements document to turn the existing free-tier scalability plan into an actionable implementation contract for a teammate.
Changes:
- Introduces a phased work plan (security/config hardening, throughput, async queue isolation, operational guardrails) with acceptance criteria.
- Defines a “Definition of Done” and a mandatory test gate with expected Jest suites.
- Provides a suggested PR breakdown and a PR verification template for rollout discipline.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| In scope: | ||
| 1. Phase 1 hardening: webhook fail-closed, config validation and clamps, pagination safety checks. | ||
| 2. Phase 2 throughput improvements: commit aggregation, fanout reduction, reconnect efficiency, log-level guards. | ||
| 3. Phase 3 async isolation: queue-backed heavy processing for webhook and AI architecture analysis. | ||
| 4. Phase 4 guardrails: runtime metrics, latency, queue depth, alerts, and overload controls. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The document mixes phase naming schemes: Scope refers to “Phase 1–4”, but the execution sections are labeled “Phase A–D”. This makes it harder to cross-reference with the source plan; consider using one consistent phase numbering/lettering throughout (and ideally match the source plan’s Phase 1–4).
| 2. Type safety | ||
| - npm run typecheck | ||
|
|
||
| 3. Frontend lint baseline |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The label “Frontend lint baseline” is misleading: npm run lint runs eslint . (repo-wide), not frontend-only. Rename this step (or split into separate frontend/backend lint commands if that’s the intent) so the test gate matches what actually runs.
| 3. Frontend lint baseline | |
| 3. Repository-wide lint baseline |
| 1. Phase A complete and merged. | ||
| 2. Phase B complete and merged. | ||
| 3. Queue-based processing path merged for at least webhook heavy work. | ||
| 4. Metrics endpoint/logging added with memory, latency, and queue indicators. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Phase C tasks include moving AI architecture analysis to async jobs, but the Definition of Done only mandates a queue-based path for webhook work (“at least webhook heavy work”). Either update DoD to explicitly require the AI offload too, or clarify that the AI portion of Phase C is optional/out of scope for this execution cycle so expectations are unambiguous.
Description
Type of Change
Related Issues
Screenshots (if applicable)
Testing
Checklist